Close Date Expand Location Next Open/Close Previous 0.5 of 5 stars 1 of 5 stars 1.5 of 5 stars 2 of 5 stars 2.5 of 5 stars 3 of 5 stars 3.5 of 5 stars 4 of 5 stars 4.5 of 5 stars 5 of 5 stars Repeat Slide Current slide

Krasner and Pollock: Past Continuous

Today I did that thing where I knowingly miss the point of the Met, whizzing past its vast collection of antiquities from around the globe in favor of a marquee exhibition of modern American painters. It was Lee Krasner and Jackson Pollock this time, and by far the largest collection of either artist’s work I’ve ever had the privilege of viewing. I was especially keen to dig in on Krasner, as I’m as guilty as anyone of letting her live in Pollock’s shadow. In all honesty, overall, I found her paintings and collages somewhat hit or miss, but don’t read that as a slight, because the hits hit. Take “Shattered Color,” an early work in her “Little Images” period following an extended creative block in the mid-1940s, which I stared at, slack-jawed, for a good long while.

An abstract painting with small dabs of color applied haphazardly but evenly across the canvas
“Shattered Color,” 1947, Lee Krasner, oil on canvas, 26×22″

One way I noticed that the couple rubbed off on each other in that pivotal time was their propensity for a busy, all-over abstraction that tends to give off an aggregate grayscale effect. As much as I appreciate that many of those works reward closer inspection with smaller prismatic bursts, I prefer the works whose bold color is more readily apparent, like the one above, and like my favorite of Pollock’s famous drip paintings, “Convergence: Number 10, 1952.”

An abstract painting with interwoven drips of black, white, red, yellow, and blue paint
“Convergence: Number 10, 1952,” 1952, Jackson Pollock, oil on canvas, 155×93½″

I’m not sure I had gotten to see this one in person before, and I can’t overstate how looking at a smaller version now simply does not do justice to the effect of seeing this mammoth painting up close and at scale.